<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Billy&#039;s TWC Blog</title>
		<link>http://billy.mozfaq.org/twc/blog/index.php</link>
		<description><![CDATA[No Footer]]></description>
		<copyright>Copyright 2012, Billy</copyright>
		<managingEditor>Billy</managingEditor>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<generator>SPHPBLOG 0.5.1</generator>
		<item>
			<title>HD STAR... where are you?</title>
			<link>http://billy.mozfaq.org/twc/blog/index.php?entry=entry080825-103623</link>
			<description><![CDATA[As I sit here and type this, it is August 25, 2008. It has been nearly three months since The Weather Channel HD has launched, and to this date, there are still no signs of an HD-capable WeatherSTAR unit for the new HD channel. For those who get TWC HD on their cable lineups (which seems to be an ever growing list), I&#039;m sure most viewers are wondering where their local forecast is and why they&#039;re seeing the (albeit stunning-looking) generic satellite forecast feed.<br /><br />TWC has had the move to HD in their sights for years now. We&#039;ve been hearing since 2006 that TWC will be going HD, and now that it is a reality, the final piece of the puzzle is the HD STAR. Now, I realize that creating a new piece of hardware capable of outputting HD graphics isn&#039;t something that can be created overnight, but they&#039;ve had at least two years to work on it, and there are still no signs of it anywhere.<br /><br />At this rate, I&#039;d expect not to see the HD STAR to be released until 2009, at the earliest. Because, even if we do see a beta released to select cable headends today, there needs to be at least a few months of beta testing until it is ready to be released to all.]]></description>
			<category>Weather STARs, TWC HD</category>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://billy.mozfaq.org/twc/blog/index.php?entry=entry080825-103623</guid>
			<author>Billy</author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 15:36:23 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://billy.mozfaq.org/twc/blog/comments.php?y=08&amp;m=08&amp;entry=entry080825-103623</comments>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Trammell Fest &#039;08</title>
			<link>http://billy.mozfaq.org/twc/blog/index.php?entry=entry080808-211731</link>
			<description><![CDATA[My friend, we are in the middle of the longest Trammell Starks outage in years. The outage first occurred Wednesday morning at 10:18 AM ET and has been happening ever since.<br /><br />Basically, the SD satellite local forecast feed is broken so to compensate for that, TWC has estated the &quot;emergency feed&quot; which is basically a looping satellite local forecast and a loop of 20 Trammell Starks songs.<br /><br />At this point, we don&#039;t know any details as to what is wrong, but hopefully we&#039;ll learn something as time passes. But for now, sit back and enjoy the Trammell Starks music!]]></description>
			<category>General TWC, Music</category>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://billy.mozfaq.org/twc/blog/index.php?entry=entry080808-211731</guid>
			<author>Billy</author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 02:17:31 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://billy.mozfaq.org/twc/blog/comments.php?y=08&amp;m=08&amp;entry=entry080808-211731</comments>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>No Storm Alert for Dolly?</title>
			<link>http://billy.mozfaq.org/twc/blog/index.php?entry=entry080723-203817</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Well, now that Hurricane Dolly has made landfall and will continue to dissipate over southern Texas, TWC missed a golden opportunity to go into the much-hyped Storm Alert mode. <br /><br />Surely, Hurricane Dolly was a much bigger event than the wimpy storms of Alberto and Ernesto of 2006, yet they go into Storm Alert for Alberto and Ernesto (twice, in fact, for the latter). Why didn&#039;t they go into Storm Alert for Dolly? Have they gone back to the 2005 criteria for Storm Alert where the storm has to be a category 3 or greater? Sure, Dolly was a category 2 at landfall, but maybe the winds were just a few mines per hours too weak?<br /><br />We may never know.<br /><br />Well in any case, we did get to see Day Planner go HD for storm coverage about a week or so early, so I guess that is a plus. Also, we did get some nice HD shots (when the satellite transmission worked) of Jim, Mike, Mike, and Julie getting blown around in the  rain, so I guess that is a plus.<br /><br />Also while we&#039;re on the topic, I&#039;d like to take this opportunity to send out my well wishes out to anyone effected by Dolly in northern Mexico and southern Texas. I hope for a speedy recovery for all those in the effected areas.]]></description>
			<category>TWC HD, General TWC</category>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://billy.mozfaq.org/twc/blog/index.php?entry=entry080723-203817</guid>
			<author>Billy</author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 01:38:17 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://billy.mozfaq.org/twc/blog/comments.php?y=08&amp;m=07&amp;entry=entry080723-203817</comments>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Marshall Seese to retire</title>
			<link>http://billy.mozfaq.org/twc/blog/index.php?entry=entry080721-161800</link>
			<description><![CDATA[From <a href="http://press.weather.com/press_detail.asp?id=197" target="_blank" >press.weather.com</a>:<br /><br /><blockquote>ATLANTA – July 21, 2008 -- The Weather Channel announced today that Marshall Seese, co-anchor of Your Weather Today, will be retiring from the network in November.  His replacement on the all weather network’s morning show has not been named.   <br /><br />Seese, a 20-year veteran of The Weather Channel, has been co-host with Heather Tesch of the popular morning program Your Weather Today since its launch in January of 2000.  The program airs Monday through Friday from 7-10 a.m. and was the first TWC program to launch from the network’s new HD studio on June 2.  Prior to that, Seese was an on-camera meteorologist at The Weather Channel. <br /><br />He was hired more than twenty years ago by Ray Ban, executive vice president of programming and meteorology, who says of Seese -- &quot;We appreciate the many years of service Marshall has provided in his always-professional manner, both on and off the air.  He has been an important part of the growth of The Weather Channel and I join everyone here in wishing him well.&quot;           <br /><br />Among the weather events that Seese most remembers covering is Hurricane Hugo.  As the correspondent on Force Four, The Weather Channel show nominated for a CableACE Award, he interviewed a variety of people including Marilyn Quayle, wife of then Vice President Daniel Quayle, and residents who were personally devastated by the hurricane.           <br /><br />Prior to joining The Weather Channel, Seese was seen on WGNX-TV in Atlanta and KENS-TV in San Antonio, TX.  A native of Park Ridge, IL a suburb of Chicago, Seese graduated from the University of Illinois at Champaign-Urbana. <br /><br /># # #  </blockquote><br /><br />The news came as quite a shock to me. Marshall was a great OCM and will certainly be missed on-air. I just hope he can enjoy his last months on air and the beginning of his new life being retired.<br /><br />Now the nagging question will be who is going to replace Marshall on &quot;Your Weather today&quot;? ]]></description>
			<category>OCMs</category>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://billy.mozfaq.org/twc/blog/index.php?entry=entry080721-161800</guid>
			<author>Billy</author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 21:18:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://billy.mozfaq.org/twc/blog/comments.php?y=08&amp;m=07&amp;entry=entry080721-161800</comments>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Weekend View in HD</title>
			<link>http://billy.mozfaq.org/twc/blog/index.php?entry=entry080713-210252</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Well, Weekend View is the latest show on TWC to go HD. I must say, I&#039;m not that impressed. What was once a unique, laid-back weekend take on the weather has turned into another four hours of generic TWC. The whole &quot;we&#039;re doing the weather from a couch and without a tie&quot; approach is out the window, so-to-speak. <br /><br />Weekend View is using the same &quot;set&quot; as PM Edition uses with the fake windows background.<br /><br /><img src="http://billy.mozfaq.org/twc/blog_images/weekend_view_set.jpg" width="320" height="240" border="0" alt="" /><br /><br />And then there is the other part of this studio with the out-of-place gray TWC logos plastered on the wall and the portrait-oriented LCD display.<br /><br /><img src="http://billy.mozfaq.org/twc/blog_images/weekend_view_twc_logos.jpg" width="320" height="240" border="0" alt="" /><br /><br />Honestly, I was expecting more from Weekend View. Whatever happened to the couch in the HD studio which was labeled as the &quot;interview corner&quot; in the <a href="http://www.weather.com/tv/studio/index.html" target="_blank" >studio tour</a>?]]></description>
			<category>TWC HD</category>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://billy.mozfaq.org/twc/blog/index.php?entry=entry080713-210252</guid>
			<author>Billy</author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 02:02:52 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://billy.mozfaq.org/twc/blog/comments.php?y=08&amp;m=07&amp;entry=entry080713-210252</comments>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>My thoughts on the NBC purchase of TWC</title>
			<link>http://billy.mozfaq.org/twc/blog/index.php?entry=entry080711-231537</link>
			<description><![CDATA[In case you haven&#039;t heard, NBC-Universal has <a href="http://press.weather.com/press_detail.asp?id=191" target="_blank" >purchased</a> The Weather Channel. <br /><br />Here&#039;s my take on it: <br /><br />I don&#039;t think we&#039;ll see any major changes to TWC as we know it today. NBC has said that TWC will remain in Atlanta, and I think that is a good decision. Sure, the rest of NBC is located in New York, but TWC will apparently will remain a separate entity. Ditching the new HD studios would be a really dumb thing to do after all the time and money that was invested into it. If TWC would move TWC out of the Atlanta area, that would mean relocating all the hundreds of TWC employees, and the Atlanta area would lose a lot of jobs plus economical losses.<br /><br />I definitely think that NBC will not mess with the &quot;Local On The 8s&quot; concept. That is one of the main selling points of The Weather Channel, and changing it could be disastrous. I don&#039;t believe they would remove the Weather STARs and replace them with local meteorologists or something like that. The STAR framework is already in place and it would be way too costly now to change it now.<br /><br />As for the future of Weatherscan and Weather Plus, I see that much less clearly; Their future could be very hazy. I prefer Weatherscan over Weather Plus for a few reasons:<br /><br />1. The interface of Weatherscan compared to Weather Plus is a lot better. Weatherscan is a quick way to quickly check the current conditions, forecast, and radar. With Weather Plus, you may be waiting around to see any of the local conditions, forecast, or radar.<br /><br />2. Weatherscan is much more localized. Weatherscan units typically only serve one one or two communities, but Weather Plus installations must provide weather information for a much larger market area. For example, here in my market, there are at least three (and probably a lot more) Weatherscan installations that I know of compared to one Weather Plus channel for the entire area. <br /><br />Overall, I don&#039;t think we&#039;ll see that many changes to TWC after the NBC-Universal buyout is complete. It will still be the same old TWC that we&#039;ve known for the past few years.]]></description>
			<category>TWC News, General TWC</category>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://billy.mozfaq.org/twc/blog/index.php?entry=entry080711-231537</guid>
			<author>Billy</author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 04:15:37 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://billy.mozfaq.org/twc/blog/comments.php?y=08&amp;m=07&amp;entry=entry080711-231537</comments>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>TWC Blog</title>
			<link>http://billy.mozfaq.org/twc/blog/index.php?entry=entry080709-232023</link>
			<description><![CDATA[This section of my site needs something new. I was standing there at work today, and it hit me. I&#039;ll try out a blog to discuss TWC-related stuff on my mind. I decided to create a separate blog dedicated to TWC because if I started adding TWC-related stiff to my normal blog, some of the regular readers might lose interest; I&#039;ll still maintain my other <a href="http://billy.mozfaq.org/blog/" target="_blank" >blog</a>.]]></description>
			<category>Site News</category>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://billy.mozfaq.org/twc/blog/index.php?entry=entry080709-232023</guid>
			<author>Billy</author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 04:20:23 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://billy.mozfaq.org/twc/blog/comments.php?y=08&amp;m=07&amp;entry=entry080709-232023</comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

